|
BY MICHAEL BUGEJA Keats
wrote that
beauty is truth, and truth beauty, and that is all we know on earth and
needed
to know. Then
again, he died
at 25 and writ his name on water. I’m 55 and write on liquid crystal
displays. Truth
is supposed
to set you free and beauty, take your breath away; but ugly truth
paralyzes
like apnea: You forget to breath. I
confronted an
ugly truth last month when NBC television reported that it would pay
Paris
Hilton $1 million to learn about her jail house experience. Caught
driving with
a suspended license while on probation for drunk driving, she wept for
her
mother when led to her cell but emerged, she claimed, with new insight
into the
human condition. Paris
Hilton resurrects many
clichés, including beauty being only skin deep. These days in
news, truth is
skin deep, too. To gauge how much, do a Google search of “
The
continuing focus on Hilton,
the oxymoronic “reality television” star, has reached pandemic
proportions, so
much so, that The Houston Chronicle used
this headline on a political column about romantic woes of socialist
(not
socialite) Ségolène
Royal in its June 19, 2007
edition—“Paris
(France, not Hilton) and great summer
viewing.” The
spotlight on “soft news”
is troubling enough when harder (uglier) stories need to be told. But what passes now for truth as well as
beauty
also may explain our general ignorance about all we need to know on
earth.
Realizing
that, I questioned
my life’s work as a journalist. We’re paying Paris Hilton for news,
enriching an
heiress on her life
behind bars because of bars.
Worse,
the audience
acknowledges its voyeuristic tendencies and doesn’t seem to care that
journalism has sold its soul to a socialite and, in the process, lost
its zeal,
its intelligence and, perhaps most importantly, its courage.
How did we get to this low point in media history? Money, as always, is at the root. In seducing members of the audience, asking via Internet what they wanted rather than needed to know, and then delivering that replete with ads, ad nauseam, media giants learned that fun is cheaper than fact and could be aligned with target market. Why finance news bureaus around the world when nobody seems to care about the world? Long ago, I worked for a worldwide wire service, United Press International, whose reporters included White House bureau chief Helen Thomas and combat reporter Kate Webb. Helen
has seen her
share of ugly truths. Everything she feared about government has come
to pass,
from war to global warming. She will be 87 next month. Still, she
perseveres,
“holding the banner on honor” and writing about injustice in the world.
Few
people anymore
recall the saga of Kate Webb during the Vietnam War. She was believed
captured
and killed in Kate,
who died
earlier this year, was a role model for many of my generation. I
reported for UPI in
the 1970s when media helped end the U.S.-Vietnam War and The
Washington Post exposed the ugly truth about Richard Nixon. I
investigated
banks and nursing homes and
covered riots in prisons and substandard housing on Indian
reservations, along
with natural and manmade disasters such as floods and near-extinction
of the
eagle. Words
had the power to topple presidents, stop wars,
enforce laws, expose fraud, save lives and, on occasion, even species. I saw
beauty in words,
in truth. So much so, that I would leave UPI and profess that, teaching
thousands
of aspiring journalists how to afflict the comfortable and comfort the
afflicted. Then
the
comfortable bought the franchise, and it’s been a party ever since. In
December’s Ecologist, I wrote about “The Electric
Cabaret,” recounting how society was amusing itself on demand with cell
phones,
iPods and other gizmos. Shortly after that article appeared, I gave a
speech about
the state of the news media. In
2003, I noted,
top stories were the war in Things haven’t
changed that much. In 2006,
we were still dealing with the Iraq War,
American Idol, Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. NASA was in the news
with
astronauts gone wild in adulterous affairs. Time’s
“Person of the Year” was “You” in a tube, inspired by the sale
of
YouTube for $1.65 billion to the search engine Google. “The best is yet
to come in 2007,” I prophesied
in my speech. “Top stories will be, let’s see … the Iraq War, a
Presidential
election whose outcome will be determined by YouTube or blog … replete
with
nauseating follow-ups on Paris Hilton and Britney Spears, punctuated by
scandals stereotyping athletes or beautiful women murdered or gone
missing in
exotic places.” It has been much
the same in the How do we end
the 24/7 news cycle of skin-deep
beauty and surface truths? How do we face the truths of our lives, that
what we
perceive as
ugly—that paralyzing apnea of recognition—says all we need to know
about where society
has faltered? During
such
moments, I usually think of Kate Webb. In one of her last interviews,
she
confided to me that in matters of conscience, as of heart, there are no
boundaries
or overriding principles. “You come up with your own solution” to
injustice
“and then live up to that in your actions.” That
remains the
key to many of our social ills, in our own lives and in the news media.
Certainly,
we need more courageous journalists to commit to truth and fight
injustice. But
we also need an audience that understands the price of admission in
Disney’s
new media amusement park. It is
no surprise
that Disney, a company whose brand is a cartoon mouse, is one of a
handful of
conglomerates controlling global media, along with the likes of Time
Warner,
Viacom, Bertelsmann, General Electric and Murdoch’s News Corporation.
The Big Four on Internet, controlling much of the advertising revenue,
are Google, Yahoo, MSN and AOL. We
live in their
mediated world whose story boards resolve problems in the allotted time
frames.
Life doesn’t follow art in an artless, ugly world. If it did, I’d be
quoting
Keats now who, according to literary legend, died because of a bad
review—“snuffed out by an article,” as Byron put it—and who believed
the
fiercest hell was failure in a great endeavor.
Our
life work may
seem a waste when like Keats we invest in outcomes rather than in
actions. Ugly
truth ferments and occasionally transforms society, with those
responsible long
gone without recognition, like Kate Webb, whose byline was writ on the
world
and changed the world. During
her captivity
in If
journalists did
their job as Kate did, we’d be released, too, from our own bemused
captivity.
Until then, our yardstick is the conscience and whether we honored it.
Only
then can the ugly metamorphose again into beauty, if not in society,
then
inside us. |